One of my issues with this is that there will be more literature as I go and so this can't be one defining document. Marina suggested I publish the table in which I'm synthesising findings in the papers, on a public website so it can be constantly updated. I like this idea.
On a writing retreat this week I showed my writing group the efforts so far and I have to say I was a bit disappointed with the feedback at first. The general opinion was that I shouldn't try and publish this lit review as most journals would not be interested in it as after all who am I to tell the world..? They suggested I keep writing it up but that it becomes a chapter in the Thesis rather than a journal article. That's actually fine and I'll discuss this with my supervisors next week.
So where I am at right now is trying to weave the themes that have come from my searching, with the relevant items from the articles and then craft a suitable reflection/discussion and conclusion.
Themes I'm working with are:
Formative
vs. summative evaluation
Building
capacity in evaluation skills
Non-completion
of project elements (such as evaluation, reports and the project itself)
Non-usage
of evaluation findings
Importance
of stakeholder involvement
Inaccurate
initial expectations (could be linked to #2)
Importance
of planning and defining clear evaluation criteria
Evaluation
approaches, models or frameworks
need to write more about the methodolgy used - synthesis of the articles and manually extracting themes etc - ref. Krippendorf.
ReplyDelete